Vivek spits hard truths at a heckler. 🌈 pic.twitter.com/obBNxsPp9R

— Mark Lewis (@Maga4liberty) September 12, 2024

That Target Dog

Fighting for women

A teammate of Lia Thomas appeared in What Is A Woman anonymously. A few days ago she came to us and said she is ready to come out publicly and tell her story. I had a longer conversation with Paula where she revealed a number of details that weren't covered in the film. Watch: pic.twitter.com/wlknGmslJC

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 5, 2023

Dealing With The Threat

This post is kind of a continuation of last week’s post, about the invasion of genetically male-claiming-to-be-gender-fluid into spaces formerly the preserve of genuinely, original-equipment-issue XX females … and no, I will not play the variable-gender game and use your favored pronouns. (Should you demand that of me, mine are ‘Your Highness’ and ‘My Lady’). I admit that yes, there are those very rare occurrences of people who are genuinely physically inter-sex from birth, and another small number who have fully undertaken to conduct their lives as the opposite sex of what they were observed to be at birth; this after careful consideration, with surgery, hormones, and the choice of suitable dressing/makeup. But it doesn’t really change anything at all, save the superficial impression. When in a thousand, two thousand, or five thousand years, a future archeologist excavates the bodies of one of those people, the skeletal features and residual DNA will read the remains as either male or female – no matter what they maintained an appearance/pretense of being in life.

Frankly, I otherwise wouldn’t much care about the kinks of other adults. I’ve always subscribed to the wisdom of the Edwardian-era actress and correspondent with GB Shaw, Mrs. Patrick Campbell, who famously remarked that she didn’t much care what people did in the bedroom, just that they weren’t doing it in the road and frightening the horses. My own metric was “consenting, adult, and private” which does admittedly leave open a wide range of sexual behaviors such as incest and polygamy. Really, I don’t care. Just don’t demand my rapturous approval. And don’t go about flaunting it in places where the rest of us just can’t look away, m’kay?

I wouldn’t care about transgender matters at all, if they weren’t so determined to strip off and wag the wing-wang in my face, or that of teenage girls and boys, elementary-school students, and apparently everyone else considering buying a cheap intercourse-inna-canoe-beer or a stretchy swimsuit modeled by a model who needs minimal stretch in the breast area, but plenty in the crotch. Or invade places like … hospital wards, prison units, sorority houses, leisure spas, locker rooms, changing rooms, bathrooms, and the like, under the handy guise of claiming to ‘identify as’ female. No matter how unconvincing the pretense, and it appears that many of those pretenses are extraordinarily unconvincing, the perverts and sexual predators are determined on indulging their kink, while male and female authority figures positively cheerlead for the program of invasion. They accrue woke points in the eyes of their peers, I surmise. And the perverts, predators and scammers get away with it. Or at least, they have gotten away with it so far, although this might be on the cusp of changing.

Why have ordinary women wavered on tolerating the invasion of their private spaces and sports competitions. Why would this be? Or as my late father would say – “How come?” While I am not a credentialed sociologist or specialist in human behavior – from what I have read and observed in my own life and gathered from others, women are generally much more vulnerable to social pressure from other women. Maybe it stems from having to be tight with the band of sisters and mothers when we were all part of a prehistoric hunter-gathering tribe, perhaps it’s from centuries of having to have solidarity with other women while living a very circumscribed life as a matter of survival – a dictatorship of petticoats as a 19th-century observer would have put it, in a tight circle of home-hearth-children-family. Whatever the basis for this might be – women in general have a notably much higher threshold for “This-is-crazy-y’all-are-nuts-I’m-outta-here!” then men. And teenage girls, going through the doubt and misery of going through puberty – with all which the confusion which that entails – seem to be most susceptible to destructive peer pressure, transient fads, social bullying, and the general madness of female crowds. There are exceptions to this, though – Sarah Hoyt calls them “Odds”; the freaks, non-conformists, outliers, eccentrics, and rebels; those of us who wander down a different path, pursuing a fascination in something other than what our peers are interested in. It could be a non-traditional sport or profession, or just defying the current convention by building a stable family and raising your children yourself. (It was noted that many of the women who regularly post comments at According to Hoyt are … military veterans. Which is curious in itself, as female veterans aren’t all that numerous in the general population.) It’s my feeling that it will be the non-conformist women, the “Odds” and the rebels who will not tolerate the trans madness and the invasion of female spaces, and who will take the lead in resisting the invasion of female spaces, and in bringing the trans-fad to a halt. Discuss as you wish.

POLICE STOP TRANSGENDER TERRORIST FROM SHOOTING UP ANOTHER SCHOOL

Another Democrat mass shooting attack was thwarted.  This time in Colorado.

 

 Colorado authorities arrested a 19-year-old suspect for allegedly planning to shoot up multiple schools in Colorado Springs.

The 18th Judicial District Attorney’s Office on Thursday said the defendant, William Whitworth, who identified as "Lilly" and – according to a DA spokesman – was in the process of transitioning to female. ...

...

During questioning, Whitworth admitted to planning a school shooting, with the suspect's former middle school, Timberview, being a "main target," according to the affidavit. 

Arrest papers say deputies found a drawn layout of the school and a manifesto filled with "schizophrenic rants" and mentions of serial killers, politicians, and entertainers, including the Columbine shooters and former President Donald Trump. 

This shirt is now the symbol of a domestic terror movement pic.twitter.com/zVuFViCKZo

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) March 28, 2023

They want you and your kids dead. Remember this. pic.twitter.com/JYkdywzf4z

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) March 28, 2023

 

The Truth Hurts, And It Will Hurt Leftists Most

 

So, the media is really mad that conservatives publicized how a hospital that admitted – hell, that proudly put on its website – how it mutilates kids to conform them to their (or their Munchausen mommies’) gender delusions actually mutilates kids to conform them to their (or their Munchausen mommies’) gender delusions. No, it didn’t, we were told. But it did. Moreover, telling the truth – again, a truth the hospital admitted and even kind of bragged about – was actual, literal violence. Yes, stating what the abattoir masquerading as a hospital said it did publicly was terrorism or something because normal people were naturally repelled at this hideous continuing atrocity.

The truth is problematic because it contradicts the narrative which, in this case, is “Of course we don’t chop up children to make them into bizarre simulacrums of the opposite gender.” But the narrative doesn’t stop there – no, the narrative is also “And it’s a good thing to chop up children to make them into bizarre simulacrums of the opposite gender. Shut up, transphobes.”

See, they deny doing it even though they also think it’s a groovy thing to do. Then they tell you that you are evil for speaking the truth. It’s like the whole CRT shell game. “CRT? Why, that’s a graduate school theory that is not taught in schools despite those documents we prepared stating that we are teaching CRT. Also, CRT cannot be removed from schools because it is a good thing that we must teach. Shut up racists.”

And let’s not forget the delightful euphemism of late-term abortion. “Why no, no one ever aborts a fetus at eight months, three weeks. Also, it’s vital to women’s health to kill babies at eight months, three weeks. Why do you hate women?”

The truth hurts, so the left just sort of hand waves the truth into oblivion and accuses you for bringing it up. Why allow bourgeois concepts like objective truth to get in the way of the Official Approved Narrative?

Well, because the truth matters.

No one-not a Dem or GOP nor ANY talking head on TV makes more sense these days than...wait for it...@billmaher He is the new Capt Kirk-he goes where no one has gone before. To a place of curiosity, cynicism, & common sense. What journalism used to be. This monologue is brilliant. https://t.co/qmSgywddLC

— Gov. Mike Huckabee (@GovMikeHuckabee) May 21, 2022

I’m sorry, but a woman cannot just click her fingers and become a ‘he’.

 FROM SPIKED:

We need to talk about Ellen Page

So that’s it, is it? Ellen Page is no more? She’s been disappeared? She’s been shoved down the memory hole, left to stalk that netherworld of people whose names must never be uttered out loud, like Bruce Jenner, Frank Maloney, Voldemort? Ellen Page, the actress most famous for starring in irritant quirkhouse movie Juno, has now declared that she is Elliot Page and that she’s a he. And, boom, just like that, Ellen’s gone. She’s being erased from film history. People are getting into trouble even for saying the word ‘Ellen’. ‘Who?’, woke identitarians ask, as if they’ve all gone mad.

We need to talk about this. Specifically we need to talk about Ellen Page. We need to talk about the fact that this woman – yes, woman – existed in public life and in the celluloid imagination for many years, and that can’t just be scrubbed from the record, Soviet-style. Yesterday, Ellen issued a statement saying she is now Elliot and her pronouns are he and they. That’s just bad grammar. Swiftly, slavishly even, the establishment media and the film world rushed to erase Ellen, the movie star of a decade’s standing. It’s like she never existed. From IMDb to Wikipedia, it’s all Elliot. ‘Elliot Page is a Canadian actor’, Wikipedia tells us. Where’s Ellen gone?

I’m sorry, but a woman cannot just click her fingers and become a ‘he’...

Ugly Lady Gives Birth, News Outlets Pretend She’s a Man

This is a woman.

With the sensational headline, Transgender Man Gives Birth to Non-Binary Partner’s Baby with Female Sperm Donor, the UK Mirror acted as though something novel happened. In reality, the story is that a woman with self-induced hormonal problems gave birth as a surrogate to a baby conceived by her lesbian lover and male sperm donor.

Of course, men don’t have wombs and women don’t have sperm. In fact, the reality that the woman has a womb should clarify she is, in fact a woman. And the fact the man has sperm should, in fact, clarify he’s a man.

What happened to sex education in the public school system? Has it failed us that poorly?

If a woman has a beard, but still has an womb, ovaries, and not least of all, XX chromosomes, that’s a woman.

An ugly woman giving birth is not news. It literally happens all the time. The Mirror’s reporting is fake news.

Read the rest of the story.

This is where Democrats took us.

You actually have two problems here: number one you have a dick. Number two you are a dick. https://t.co/bYt5Gif6iA

— (((Charlie Martin))) (@chasrmartin) December 3, 2019

Reclaiming our language from transgender activists

“The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meaning and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meaning whatever.” — George Orwell, 1984.

Is your penis male or female?

The answer:

"If a woman has a penis, her penis is a biologically female penis," @IndyaMoore said. https://t.co/vWudbq5e4x

— PinkNews (@PinkNews) February 19, 2019

Mark Steyn asks: What sort of woman would be offended by the sight of another woman's penis?

You can't make this stuff up fast enough to get ahead of the crazies.

Three years ago I wrote:

I can't recall ever describing The Vagina Monologues as 'edgy'. But I did tell Joseph Brean that I was amused to see that its annual 'V Day' production at Mount Holyoke College has been canceled because of its 'extremely narrow perspective on what it means to be a woman'. Hence, this Guardian headline: 'Vagina Monologues playwright: "I never said a woman is someone with a vagina".' As I said to Mr Brean, the revolution devours its own: Less than 20 years after Eve Ensler 'empowered' women by 'reclaiming' their vaginas, it seems a woman doesn't need a vagina at all, and it's totally cisgenderist to suggest you're not a woman if you're hung like a horse.

As is my wont, I was playing it for laughs - but, as I always say, none of the people who matter in our society are laughing. Hence, the Bathroom Wars of the subsequent years, in which the position of what used to be known to Common Law as the Reasonable Man (now presumably the Reasonable Cisman) is apparently (as I put it on Rush): What sort of woman would be offended by the sight of another woman's penis?

So this latest development in Trump Resistance anniversary observances was entirely predictable:

Pink pussyhats are being dropped from Women's March because they 'exclude trans women and women whose private parts are not pink'

The pink is racist, and the pussy is transphobic. The Pussyhat Project has now issued a clarification of the rules:

The color pink was chosen "because pink is associated with femininity," the Pussyhat Project posted on its website. "We did not choose the color pink as a representation of some people's anatomy. Anyone who supports women's rights is welcome to wear a Pussyhat. It does not matter if you have a vulva or what color your vulva may be. If a participant wants to create a Pussyhat that reflects the color of her vulva, we support her choice."

Read the whole thing.

If you're a normal man today and would rather not to date a creature who was once a man but now believes it's a woman  you're a hate filled bigot according to the masters of modern culture.   The inmates running the asylum was once a joke; not any more.

NYTimes: Ok to sexualize children for the cause of genderqueer

The article spends much of its focus on celebrating so-called gender fluidity and promotes the idea that parents who indulge, or promote, their pre-pubescent sons to become genderqueer advocates are doing A Good Thing™.

Tumblr Feminism: So Stupid It Hurts

Via The Other McCain

Tumblr Feminist 1:

The way some of these people defend gender reveal parties, they talk like it’s a centuries long tradition and not something made up in the last decade in reaction against gay + trans people gaining positive social visibility

Tumblr Feminist 2:

it’s absurd how quickly it’s been normalized!

Ask yourself, what gave rise to “gender reveal parties”?

Answer: Prenatal ultrasound, which since the 1980s has become a routine method of determining the sex (not “gender”) of children (not “fetuses”) before they are born. It was impossible to have a “gender reveal” party prior to the widespread use of ultrasound technology, because parents didn’t know whether it was a boy or a girl until it was born.

Where do these Tumblr feminists get the idea that “gender reveal parties” were “made up . . . in reaction against” LGBT “social visibility”? What kind of warped self-referential paranoia does this express?

From the comments:

You know what's been absurdly normalized so quickly?

LGBT privileges.

and

❝I think the real issue is Those Who Want To Be Noticed. That's probably an oversimplification, but at this point I am going to accept it as a working assumption.

It's not that they believe, it's that they need the perception of others to validate their belief.❞

Does anyone know what the bathroom policy is at the AP?

Dear AP, I want to go to your bathroom.  do you mind if I use the ladies room, or are yours all unisex?

Ben Shapiro Uses Age To Counter Transgender Argument — ‘Why Aren’t You 60?’