Tuesday, November 21, 2017
I fondly recall the ditzy Liberal woman who adored Charlie Rose.
And then there's this:
Something tells me that Democrats wish they had not brought up the issue of sexual harassment. This was supposed to have taken Trump out of the race. Instead it has boomeranged in the biggest way.
Michigan Rep. John Conyers, a Democrat and the longest-serving member of the House of Representatives, settled a wrongful dismissal complaint in 2015 with a former employee who alleged she was fired because she would not “succumb to [his] sexual advances.”
Monday, November 20, 2017
The Democrats spent decades telling women how Republicans hate them and now, well, it appears the Democrats like women, just the wrong way, and they like obtaining consent not at all. Pervgate is generating gross revelation after gross revelation, and basically America’s ladies are being asked, “Show me on the doll where the bad party touched you.”They’re answering, “Everywhere, and also on my houseplants.”
Strange, all she did was pretend to de-head President Trump who is assumed to be the most unpopular President in history.
The “faux-serious report” gap
Sarah Hoyt has some thoughts.
When I was looking for this report, which I vaguely remembered reading about while I was deep in the throes of finishing a novel, a friend of mine referred to it as “World to End Tomorrow: Women, Minorities Hardest Hit.”He is not wrong....I look forward to a world in which everyone is wealthy enough that men and women can work at whatever they want. And if what they want is to stay at home and raise their kids, or try to develop a business in wool dying, painting or writing, I hope they get to do it, while telling the busybodies of the Gender Gap Report to take a long hike off a short pier.If there’s one gap we liberty lovers should be concerned about, it’s the “faux-serious report” gap, in which the left has a commanding and intimidating lead.Until we close up that gap, though, we can do our best in showing how silly their reports are, how shallow their notions of equality, and how pathetic their ability to reason.
Labels: gender gap
Sunday, November 19, 2017
The process began in May 2013, in a ruling against St. Joseph’s University, and has lately accelerated (15 rulings in 2016 and 21 thus far in 2017). Of the 40 setbacks for colleges in federal court, 14 came from judges nominated by Barack Obama, 11 from Clinton nominees, and nine from selections of George W. Bush. Brown University has been on the losing side of three decisions; Duke, Cornell, and Penn State, two each.
But not fast enough. Why does a student need to go to court to get a university to treat him fairly?
Does it still surprise you that the press doesn't tell yoiu the good news comping out of the Trump Presidency?
When you're in the business of destroying Hitler, nothing gets in the way.
Glen Dale, W. Va. — Bad news travels fast. Good news, meanwhile, doesn’t seem to travel at all.Last weekend in Beijing, as part of his 12-day trip to Asia, President Trump announced that the US and China had signed an $83.7 billion memorandum of understanding to create a number of petrochemical projects in West Virginia over the next 20 years.If the agreement holds tight, it is an economic game changer for the state.And yet, speaking to the locals here, you wouldn’t even know it had happened.“I am surprised I heard nothing about it on the national news, nor in my local paper and newscasts,” said Jerald Stephens, 67, a West Virginia native and union rep, who has been a keen observer of local politics for as long as he can remember.
Surprise: He's polling better than the top European leaders.
It appears that the political split is global.
Europe's Merkel, Macron, May less popular than TrumpPresident Trump’s approval ratings, often mocked by Democrats and the media, top those of Europe’s biggest three leaders, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Britain’s Theresa May and French President Emmanuel Macron.
It appears that the political split is global.
As A Male Feminist, I Really Think I’d Absolutely Crush It If I Ever Had To Publicly Apologize For Sexual Misconduct
America is now confronting its endemic sexual harassment problem and finally holding powerful men accountable for their crimes against women in an unprecedented way. Big-name celebrities and media titans are being outed as the sex criminals they truly are, but infuriatingly, exposed serial abusers like Harvey Weinstein and Louis CK continue to issue public apologies that fail to convey sincere remorse and attempt to justify their heinous behavior. These weak, mealy-mouthed mea culpas cannot be tolerated, and as a male feminist and ally to women, I believe that I would totally crush it if I ever had to publicly apologize for sexual misconduct.Seriously. It would be an absolute slam dunk.First off, I would immediately admit to the charges leveled against me. Whatever I was accused of doing, whether it was lewd comments, groping, public masturbation, coercing female employees into sex for promotions, or something even worse, I would own up to it because, as a progressive, I do not want to contribute to a culture that discredits women for speaking up. I read enough feminist think-pieces to know that it’s important to believe women, and in my apology, there wouldn’t be any half-assed claims about misconstruing signals or consent, no fucking way. I would own that shit.Also, I wouldn’t wait until a Cosby-sized crowd of victims stepped forward .....
You have to read the whole thing.
I have called Trump a Populist in other essays, like this one, becaue I didn't associate poplism with evil. I may have been wrong. Here's an intersting - and valid - take by F. H. Buckley (no relation to William F. Buckley - or Natioanl Review, thank God).
You should never let your opponents define you, because they’re not looking to do you any favors. That’s why Republicans, especially those who voted for President Trump, should object to being called populists.Populism was one of the nastiest of American political movements. It was inevitable, therefore, that Trump would be called a populist. But that doesn’t describe Trump, or the Republican Party he re-invented.It’s true that, like most populists, Trump thinks that tariff walls that keep foreign goods out of the country might help American workers. But then Abraham Lincoln and William McKinley thought so, too, and they weren’t populists.It’s also true that, like most populists, Trump championed an underclass unjustly held back by an aristocracy of wealth. But then Karl Marx and socialist Eugene V. Debs thought the same thing, and they weren’t populists. And like most populists, Trump decried the influence of money in politics. But then so did Hillary Clinton and Liz Warren, and nobody called them populists.Here’s what the accusation of populism really means. It’s a smear meant to link one to people like “Pitchfork Ben” Tillman, one of the vilest characters in American political history. Tillman was the governor of South Carolina from 1890 to 1894 and served as the state’s representative in the US Senate for the next 23 years. He invented Jim Crow laws in his state, defended lynch mobs and boasted of the African-Americans he had killed.Trump is something new in American politics. He’s not Andrew Jackson, or a plain-speaking Harry Truman. He’s not Ronald Reagan. He’s unlike anything we’ve seen before, for the simple reason that he’s up against something we’ve never seen before: a left that’s given up on the American dream of a mobile and classless society, that defends economic immobility and aristocracy.Trump isn’t a populist. He’s a conservative nationalist. As a conservative he favors socially conservative institutions and free-market solutions to political questions. As a nationalist he is middle of the road or liberal when it comes to taking care of Americans who have fallen behind, through a generous safety net.That might sound like an unnatural union of opposites, but similar parties have had a long history in our sister parliamentary governments. Benjamin Disraeli was another conservative nationalist. As a parliamentarian, he opposed Sir Robert Peel’s free-trade policies and in the process created a new Tory party.And a year before Friedrich Engels shocked readers with his description of the wretchedness of East End London in “The Condition of the Working Class in England” (1845), Disraeli had written no less passionately about economic inequality.Then, as the Conservative prime minister, Disraeli extended the franchise to all adult male heads of households in the 1867 Reform Bill.In a speech on the bill, Disraeli described what he thought the Tory Party should be, in terms that also define Trump’s Republican Worker’s Party:“I have always considered that the Tory party was the national party of England . . . It is formed of all classes, from the highest to the most homely, and it upholds a series of institutions that are in theory, and ought to be in practice, an embodiment of the national requirements and the security of the national rights.”As a nationalist, Disraeli and his party wanted all Britons to prosper. He could never have called one group of his countrymen deplorable, or ignored half the voters because they were in the wrong identity group.By reaching out to all Britons, he took the Whig’s issues away from them, just as Trump did in dishing the Democrats.Not much has changed, and the American who wishes to understand the shape of things to come might do well to read up on the “Tory Democracy” of Lord Randolph Churchill (Winston’s father) or observe the similarities between Trump’s agenda and the National Policy of Sir John A. Macdonald’s Tory Party in Canada.They were conservative, but because they supported generous social-welfare policies they were sometimes called Red Tories. And they’re the ancestors of Trump’s Republican Party.
That's a definition of Donald Trump I can agree with.
Saturday, November 18, 2017
Jonah Goldberg's Above It All
National Review has been one of the leaders of the #NeverTrump movement and Jonah Goldberg is a senior editor. That is a perfect place from which to position himself above the fray. Goldberg and NR hate the Trumpian populism with a burning hatred that far exceeds their dislike of the Left.
During the 2016 election they preferred Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump. Their hate of Trump and what he represents transfers to anyone who is on the same side of the cultural spectrum as Trump.
Which bring us to Roy Moore, Republican candidate for Senate from Alabama.
In this article he casts big stones at Judge Roy Moore who has been hit with a flurry of just-before-the-election sexual accusations.
Right-wingers tell me that Al Franken must resign for behavior far less offensive than what Roy Moore has been accused of.
See what he did there? Equating an unproven accusation with a fact that has been memorialized with pictures.
Where there's an opportunity to stop another Trumpian figure an accusation = a fact.
In this respect, Goldberg is vying for a SJW award; since SJWs tell us to always believe the women, unless the accusation is against a Democrat.
Goldberg deplores hypocrisy, and in an ideal world hypocrisy is to not a virtue, although I am reminded of the old saying that “hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue.” Hypocrisy is a human failing. What I find even worse is that in so much of modern society virtue is no longer honored and vice is no longer condemned. Where vice is normal, hypocrisy can't exist.
The problem with Jonah’s argument is not that it’s not abstractly worthwhile but it’s vacuous. In years past, when NR was Bill Buckley’s magazine, Jonah wrote for the Conservative Republican audience. Now that he’s a full fledged member of the #NeverTrumpers his writing is meant for a very small coterie and, except for some ankle-biting of Trump and his supporters, his writing has absolutely no effect on the culture.
It’s a form of onanism. He’s writing for a fringe of a fringe. That doesn’t make him a public intellectual; it makes him a jerk. Someone who pretends to be something he’s not. He’s not on the field where the game is being played; instead he’s wandering the sidelines jumping up and down hoping for attention.
Jonah's an entertaining writer, but opinion writers should be held to different standards than novelists. The novelist only needs to entertain to be successful. Opinion writers should have somewhat loftier goals. Advancing their ideas, for one.
Let’s check the scoreboard.
Didn’t National review call for the end of the Clinton Presidency during Whitewater and the Lewinski affair? Yes. And what happened? Bill Clinton won two terms. "We’ll just have to win" said perjurer/rapist/sleazebag Clinton. And he did.
Did National Review inveigh against the Obama presidency? It most definitely did, and what happened? He won two terms. And, I might add, changed America … as he promised; not for the better but for the worse. Not in the direction of National Review or the conservative direction, but in the direction of The Nation. The country became the country of "Hands up don't shoot" and Black Lives Matter. It honored Harvey Weinstein. It became the country of Big Lies like the UVA Non-Rape and the Duke Lacrosse non-Rape Case.
But, but, but ....That’s not fair, cries NR and the #NeverTrumpers. You can’t expect an opinion magazine and a few articles in the Wall Street Journal to effect an election. It’s the rest of the press and the Democrats who are to blame.
Can we be honest? The people who were the intellectual Generals of the Right were as effective as the Washington Generals, the patsies for the Harlem Globetrotters. The Washington Generals lost to the Harlem Globetrotters over 16,000 times. They were there to make the Globetrotters look good. And that's the role that Goldberg, and the others leaders of the "Respectable Right" were assigned. And they played their role to perfection.
So here we are. But in the meantime a strange, totally unexpected, intruder has entered Washington. Despite unified opposition from Democrats, the Press (but I repeat myself) and the Establishment Right, we have a Republican President and he has a nominally Republican Congress.
And at this juncture, when the economy is picking up, the stock market is reaching all-time highs, regulations are being repealed, energy production is booming, unemployment is at record lows, Jonah Goldberg calls us to commit political suicide. To repeat the totally ineffective, ineffectual plays that were called before. As the Democrats are circling the wagons around Al “Fish Lips” Franken, Goldberg demands that Republicans lose the Senate seat in Alabama. Bill Buckley once said that the Constitution is not a suicide pact, but Jonah Goldberg doesn't believe it. It’s said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Jonah Goldberg's not insane. He's comfortable. The old Conservative objectives of limited government and rescuing America from decline is not his objective. His eyes are closer to home.
He’s doing fine. He’s got a job at NR, a syndicated column; he’s on Fox News from time to time as one of the designated “conservatives.” He writes books, he’s happy, particularly content with the audience he’s got and the paycheck he receives. Jonah Goldberg is a business, a persona, an actor playing a role, just like many of the people who are doing well in the Swamp. In reality he’s a guy with a pretty good career and he isn’t about to blow it. That’s what pays the groceries and keeps a roof over his head. He's not that much different from the sales rep who’s meeting his quota. And he has just as much influence on the culture and the direction of American politics.
Which is interesting. Because the current President – Donald Trump – is a gifted amateur. And he’s doing a great job changing the culture, changing Washington, making America Great Again despite having to fight this particular fight virtually alone. That’s why it’s time to roll right over the professionals – the Generals who have lost the last wars; every damn one of them. It's time to go with a new team – and go with amateurs who will, at the least, fight. Because the fight means something to someone who still cares.
Bill Whittel on the Gods of the Copybook Headings
A panel featuring Gloria Borger asserts this was no big deal, because he was a comedian, and as we know from Louis CK, comedians have special license to jerk off in front of women and/or grope them as they sleep.
And also jam their tongues in their mouths after being specifically told they don't even want to do a fake stage kiss-- something the leftist media keeps "forgetting" to note.
Ace of Spades
It's good to see that, not 72 hours of their Bravery in admitting maybe they covered up and spun for Bill Clinton's sex assaults and rape too much, they're right back to providing the same service for another lesser Democrat.They truly are #TheElite and Super-Good at Thinking.
The left is calling for an end to all procreation of human beings, so it must be a day that ends in "Y" and an hour that ends in a digit.Via Ace of Spades
The "respectable" class attacks the lunacy of Alex Jones' nightmare scenarios about the top 5% of the world population wanting to exterminate the bottom 95%, but when leftists actually endorse a similar plan (actually pushing for Voluntary Human Self-Extinction), the "respectable" class pretends this is a reputable idea worth serious consideration.
That accident at Chappaquiddick Bridge
Just an internet rumor?
I question that Teddy Kennedy ‘allowed’ Mary Jo to die. The turnoff is quite abrupt and the suspicion in my mind is that it may have been deliberate. As in: “Teddy, what would you do if I told you I was pregnant?” Teddy: “We’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.”
Friday, November 17, 2017
Afterburner w/Bill Whittle: The Lynching
Anything else is a cherry on top.
According to the group, Sarah Semrad, a junior at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse who allegedly tweeted that “I f***ing hate white men,” resigned her post on the executive board of the political organization as of Tuesday morning.
Sarah Semrad, left, poses with Chelsea Clinton. Semrad was an intern for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2016.
Yup, that's the charming "I hate Whitey" next to dear old Chelsea.
I’d been in the United States Peace Corps for all of 48 hours when I received my first bag of taxpayer-funded condoms.In the Peace Corps, they don’t waste time with foreplay. This was in 2002, when I was stationed at a health sanatorium north of Tashkent, one of 50 Volunteers in training. After dinner on our second day, we were ordered to report to the clinic for the first of several rounds of vaccinations. First came the needles and then came the candy, but along with the sweets I was given a brown paper bag.I looked. “Oh, thanks,” I said, “but I don’t need this.” I handed it back. “You should take them,” the nurse assured me. “Just in case.” I blinked.I opened my mouth and closed it again. I set the bag on the table and left the room. “I’ll omit the slap this time,” I thought. “But consider yourself lucky.”...Over my two years in the Peace Corps, I would get many more openings for that cinematic slap. It’s the only place I’ve ever worked where one steps up to a conference check-in desk expecting to receive a room key, welcome folder, and bag of condoms. There was, to be sure, a method to this madness. For the most part, the Peace Corps was a magnet for educated, unwed twenty-somethings with broadly left-leaning views. Our Washingtonian handlers wanted us to spread goodwill abroad, but in an Islamic society, a recent-college-graduate approach to the bodily appetites was likelier to spread resentment and venereal disease. Thus, an implicit compromise was struck. We were not technically forbidden to have sex with locals, but we were urged to be “culturally sensitive” at our assigned work sites.Then, periodically, we were summoned to conferences at health sanatoriums deep in the mountains, where we were issued condoms and left largely to ourselves for a couple of days. Some Volunteers started referring to these scheduled get-togethers as “shore leave.” “Shore leave” was more or less what one would expect. The scheduled sessions mostly seemed like an inconsequential appendage to the (ahem) night life. Ironically, in establishments meant to restore health, the air seemed to be permeated by this raw, unmediated collision of appetite and loneliness. Both were intense.The carousel of beds, bodies, and beer bottles precipitated a different kind of culture shock for a young religious conservative. I didn’t find it liberating; I found it foul. Even so, the chastity soapbox looks monstrously unappealing when you’re 22, a freakish ideological outlier, and 12,000 miles from home.I settled into a pragmatic routine. Following my ritual refusal of the condoms, I would open a Peace Corps conference by quietly looking for a roommate agreeable to a no-sex-actually-in-the-room rule. (I wasn’t terrified of being raped, but I do prefer to have a wall between myself and the closest copulating couple.)Books and solitary walks infused some sanity into the next few days, and I completed my term of service in 2004 without ever availing myself of the free condoms, free therapy, or free trip to Planned Parenthood. (Under George W. Bush’s administration, the Peace Corps couldn’t pick up that particular bill, but we were promised that we would be delivered directly to the doorstep should relevant circumstances arise.) I won’t betray personal secrets, except to say: Some fared worse.
Read the whole thing.
Now that Bill Clinton and his trashy wife are politically impotent, Democrats want a do over on Paula Jones -- you know the state employee Governor Bill Clinton tried to force to fellate him.She sued. His lawyers deposed him. He perjured himself (and tried to suborn perjury from others) about his consensual affair with That Woman, Miss Lewinsky.Perjury and suborning perjury can be felonies, and certainly are impeachable offenses. Democrats played it as everyone lies about sex, and he beat the rap.Sex is private, right?Now, all of Washington wants to strip Alabama of the right to elect Roy Moore, and Democrats find themselves on the outside looking in.So now there are a bunch of articles about how, oh, I believe Juanita Broaddrick (who claims Clinton raped her).That's nice.It is irrelevant.Clinton is irrelevant, and Broaddrick's story is hearsay. Sorry. Absent a conviction or admission of guilt, it is just gossip.But things may have been better had people believed her when we still could have had a police investigation, indictment, and trial. You know, all the things that make us civilized instead of the boys in "Lord of the Flies."Besides, it wasn't just Clinton.It was Ted Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.Democrats -- and frankly, most Republicans -- were cool with keeping Kennedy in the Senate after he got drunk, ditched his car in the water, and left a woman to die.And 22 years later, Democrats wanted to deny Thomas a seat on the Supreme Court because a woman said he put a hair on a can of Coca-Cola.I say to heck with them.I advise my friends and relatives in Alabama to vote for Roy Moore. He can always be expelled if he's guilty. We cannot expel Doug Jones if Moore is cleared.
Left wing "press" circling the wagons: "Victim Shaming? MSNBC's Hunt: Franken’s Action ‘Not Actually Groping’"
Note that Kasie Hunt the MSNBC "reporter" actually avoids mentioning that Franken forced a kiss on Tweeden. (video at link)
Then the "non-grope grope"
Want to know one very, very big reason why Washington DC needs to be removed from our lives? Because it attracts the most horrible people.
Consider Joe Biden. A few short weeks ago, the former senator and vice president seemed like he would be a leading contender to win the Democratic nomination for president in 2020 and then the favorite to challenge President Trump's bid for re-election. But now? Biden's polling may look good, but he has a history of wandering hands that is simply incompatible with the new normal. He's a political dead man.Now think of all the pages and interns and young staffers cycling through all of those offices on Capitol Hill, year after year, decade after decade. And the countless thousands of staffers who've passed through the White House and executive branch departments and agencies across Democratic and Republican administrations. And all the Supreme Court clerks and assistants. How long until one of these pages or interns or staffers or clerks or assistants, or dozens of them, or hundreds of them, begin to talk and make credible accusations against leading public figures of both parties?How many unwanted advances, kisses, gropes, coerced sex acts, and other forms of harassment, abuse, and assault are we likely to learn about?I suspect far more than any of us can imagine.Already we know that the House has paid out $15 million over the last 10-15 years to settle sexual harassment allegations. And that is surely just the beginning.The reckoning is coming. Washington is going to weather an absolute hurricane of sexual abuse allegations and revelations.
Labels: The Washington Swamp
Tweet of the day
Student sues UC San Diego for injuries in anti-Trump election night protest shutting down freeway, claiming university ‘organized’ it
Why are Liberal institutions such hotbeds of sexual depravity?
As NPR's Board of Directors meet in Washington, D.C., this week, the network finds itself confronted by a series of dispiriting developments: a CEO on medical leave; a chief news executive forced out over sexual harassment allegations; the sudden resignation of a board chairman; fresh complaints over inappropriate behavior by colleagues; and a network roiled by tensions over the treatment of its female workers.
You should be suspicious of all men who engage in “ardent promotion of gender equality” in public settings.
What's the difference between Moore and Franken?
There's a photo of Franken in the act.
From USA Today.
It's also possible that the photo of Franken on the airplane made a difference in the case here. Despite the wave of accusations against Moore, none have photographic evidence other than a signed high school yearbook that Moore claims is phony.
Drudge on Al Franken
Joked About DRUGGING, RAPING Lesley Stahl?
Second Woman Says Franken Aggressive, Harassing Calls...
“And to think that just last week he was lecturing anyone who would listen about sexual harassment and respect for women. Lesley Stahl tape.”
Via The Other McCain
From the comments:
Tumblr Feminist 1:The way some of these people defend gender reveal parties, they talk like it’s a centuries long tradition and not something made up in the last decade in reaction against gay + trans people gaining positive social visibilityTumblr Feminist 2:it’s absurd how quickly it’s been normalized!Ask yourself, what gave rise to “gender reveal parties”?Answer: Prenatal ultrasound, which since the 1980s has become a routine method of determining the sex (not “gender”) of children (not “fetuses”) before they are born. It was impossible to have a “gender reveal” party prior to the widespread use of ultrasound technology, because parents didn’t know whether it was a boy or a girl until it was born.Where do these Tumblr feminists get the idea that “gender reveal parties” were “made up . . . in reaction against” LGBT “social visibility”? What kind of warped self-referential paranoia does this express?
You know what's been absurdly normalized so quickly?
❝I think the real issue is Those Who Want To Be Noticed. That's probably an oversimplification, but at this point I am going to accept it as a working assumption.It's not that they believe, it's that they need the perception of others to validate their belief.❞
Thursday, November 16, 2017
The New York Times keeps whitewashing communism’s crimes
It's what Communists do.
...The Trump administration marked this week’s 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution by declaring a National Day for the Victims of Communism. The New York Times marked the same anniversary in a different way: by running a series of articles extolling the virtues of communism.
The irony of the series’ title, “Red Century,” seems lost on the Times’s editors. The 20th century was “red” indeed — red with the blood of communism’s victims. The death toll of communism, cited in “The Black Book of Communism,” is simply staggering: In the USSR, nearly 20 million dead; China, 65 million; Vietnam, 1 million; Cambodia, 2 million; Eastern Europe, 1 million; Africa, 1.7 million; Afghanistan, 1.5 million; North Korea: 2 million (and counting). In all, Communist regimes killed some 100 million people — roughly four times the number killed by the Nazis — making communism the most murderous ideology in human history.
Never mind all that. University of Pennsylvania professor Kristen R. Ghodsee writes that Communists had better sex: “Eastern women had twice as many orgasms as Western women . . . [who] had less sex, and less satisfying sex, than women who had to line up for toilet paper.” She has tough words for Joseph Stalin because he “reversed much of the Soviet Union’s early progress in women’s rights — outlawing abortion and promoting the nuclear family.” Yes, that was Stalin’s crime. Not the purges, not the gulag, but promoting the nuclear family.
The Times’s series is in the tradition set by former Times Moscow bureau chief Walter Duranty, who wrote glowing reports on Stalin’s rule that included repeated denials of the mass starvation from Stalin’s engineered famine in Ukraine. “Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda,” he wrote, while millions starved to death. And besides, “You can’t make an omelet without breaking eggs.”Now, after a century of slaughter, the Times is back at it, portraying communism as a noble cause, the murders carried out in its name simply aberrations. Never mind that there is not a single example of a country where communism was tried and it did not result in terror, purges, massacres, starvation and totalitarian misery. Yet take any of the opinion pieces above and replace the word “Communist” with “Nazi,” and then try to imagine that anyone would publish them, other than perhaps the Daily Stormer.
President Trump's Middle East policy is simple: Back our friends and scare the hell out of our enemies, and negotiate where possible with our competitors like Russia and China. By and large it's working, unlike the catastrophically failed polices of the previous two administrations. Trump did what he said he would do and succeeded. You wouldn't know that from the #fakenews media.
they're too busy trying to take Trump down to enjoy American resurgence.
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
There was a time when it might have been appropriate to vote for an honorable person as a representative, and trust that he would do the right thing for me and my country.Now, the logic is reversed.I evaluate if he or she will do the right thing, i.e., not vote for policies that will continue and accelerate the destruction of our civilization, and trust that he (or now, she) will be honorable.If he or she is not honorable, I will work to replace him or her with someone who is. I will never vote for anyone, however honorable, who is on the wrong side of our civilization.That's why I voted for Trump (after my favorite Cruz lost in the primaries), and that's why I would vote for Moore if I lived in Alabama.Moore is very unlikely to vote for policies that I disfavor, and has essentially zero chance of fondling anybody I care about (assuming for the purposes of this discussion that he is as guilty as we know that Bill C., John K., Ted K., and numerous other Democrats are and were).
Via Althouse comments
Lefty Comic Al Franken uses British fake news provider to urge government censorship of news Americans are allowed to read
Advancing the Democratic Party’s new-found McCarthyism over the theme of “Russian Collusion,” Sen. Al Franken authored an op-ed piece in the Guardian last week asking for government censorship over Internet media content giants Google, Facebook and Twitter.
But what is fake news? One bit of fake news is the denial of Hillary's illness.
Michael Snyder, a Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho’s First Congressional District:
During the presidential election, there was a lot of talk about Hillary Clinton’s health. The mainstream media insisted that she was just fine, and they accused those of us in the alternative media that were questioning her health of engaging in “propaganda” and “misinformation”. Well, it turns out that we now know that Clinton’s health was so bad that Donna Brazile was actually considering replacing the nominee, and so it was actually the mainstream media that was putting out “propaganda” and “misinformation.”
Other major pieces of fake news:
- Fast and Furious was just a botched gun tracking program
- Obamacare would save every family $2500
- Benghazi was caused by a video
- Harvey Weinstein supported women's rights
- ISIS was the JV team
- “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because you know, the Cold War has been over for 20 years."
CNN especially is now indistinguishable from a Democrat propaganda machine. If we want the end of Fake News we need to start with CNN and then go through the major media before we start to censor the American people on the Internet.