The Islamic State's religious scholars have ruled that taking the organs of non-Muslims is permissible under Islamic law to save the life of a Muslim, because killing apostates to eat their flesh has previously been allowed.
Well, if cannibalism is OK, they why stop at treating your enemies like Planned Parenthood does babies.
The media insists that only "radical" Muslims are a danger to US constitutional law. Are the devout residents of Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iraq, Brunei, Pakistan, Nigeria, and other Muslim countries all "radical?" Would you consider stoning homosexuals to death - a practice in Muslim countries - radical or mainstream? Do you have a problem with putting apostates to death if they leave their religion - a practice in Muslim countries? Should women only be able to go out of their homes if accompanied by male relatives - a practice in Muslim countries? How about women wearing head coverings that hide their hair, or wearing a hijab? And what about alcoholic drinks, free speech, freedom to practice Christianity or Judaism? Notice what's happened to Christians in the part of the world where their faith was born.
There are now an estimated 3 million Muslims residing in the United States as citizens or with permanent legal status, and more than 250,000 new Muslim residents enter the U.S. per year as refugees, on work visas and student-based visas, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.
A poll commissioned in May 2015 by the Center for Security Policy showed that 51 percent of American Muslims preferred that they should have their own Shariah courts outside of the legal system ruled by the U.S. Constitution. And nearly a quarter believed the use of violent jihad was justified in establishing Shariah.
"That would translate into roughly 300,000 Muslims living in the United States who believe that Shariah is 'The Muslim God Allah's law that Muslims must follow and impose worldwide by Jihad,'" writes Frank Gaffney Jr., president of the Center for Security Policy.
