Search This Blog

Monday, December 14, 2009

The Scientific Community Demands the Return of Censors

Scientific American publishes a diatribe by Lawrence M Krauss demanding that the gatekeepers be restored. Here are some of his scientific reasons:

“The increasingly blatant nature of the nonsense uttered with impunity in public discourse is chilling. Our democratic society is imperiled as much by this as any other single threat, regardless of whether the origins of the nonsense are religious fanaticism, simple ignorance or personal gain.”


How's that for the demand that opinion "uttered with impunity" be stopped?

And how's this for reasoned debate?

... As I listen to the manifest nonsense that has been promulgated by the likes of right-wing fanatic radio hosts and moronic ex-governors ...

(I think he's referring to Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin.)

And how's this for the good old days when the ideas that were permitted were controlled by the gatekeepers?

The rise of a ubiquitous Internet, along with 24-hour news channels has, in some sense, had the opposite effect from what many might have hoped such free and open access to information would have had. It has instead provided free and open access, without the traditional media filters, to a barrage of disinformation. Nonsense claims had more difficulty gaining traction in the days when print journalism held sway and newspaper editors had the final word on what made its way into homes and when television news consisted of a half-hour summary of what a trained producer thought were the most essential stories of the day.


And for the Tea party protesters:

...thousands of zombielike protesters to Washington ...

it's Zombietime!

The problem with freedom is that there's too much of it, when in reality we need the guiding hand of the scientific elite ...

“Fair and balanced,” however, doesn’t mean putting all viewpoints, regardless of their underlying logic or validity, on an equal footing. Discerning the merits of competing claims is where the empirical basis of science should play a role.



...and no, I don't think its a parody.

No comments: