Mueller Indicts MSM
The
Mueller indictment states that the purpose of Russia’s efforts surrounding the last
general election was to sow discord. The
indictment states that the Russians made use of “divisive U.S. political and social issues,” to set
Americans against each other and “sow discord in the U.S. political system.”
The indictment goes on to say that:
Defendant
ORGANIZATION had a strategic goal to sow discord in the U.S. political system,
including the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Defendants posted derogatory
information about a number of candidates, and by early to mid-2016,
Defendants'' operations included supporting the presidential campaign of the
-candidate Donald J. Trump ("Trump Campaign") and disparaging Hillary
Clinton. Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities,
including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S.
persons and grassroots entities and U.S. persons, and without revealing their
Russian identities and ORGANIZATION affiliation, solicited and compensated real
U.S. persons to promote or disparage candidates. Some Defendants, posing as
U.S> persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated
with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign and with other
political activists to seek to coordinate political activities.
If sowing discord was the object, any objective
observer would conclude that the Russians were spectacularly successful. For roughly half the country, Donald Trump is
an illegitimate President, soon to be impeached, a Russian puppet manipulated by
Putin, and the second coming of Hitler.
How did that happen if,
as asserted by the Mueller indictment, most of the Russian effort was to
disparage Hillary? The indictment is a
banal recitation of the use of social media, primarily Facebook and Twitter to call
Hillary names and to promote “flash mobs” for Trump. It is alleged that two of the thirteen people
indicted actually came to the U.S. There
is literally nothing in the indictment that would lead anyone to conclude that
the Russians had any effect on the election …. at all. Because that was not the objective.
In the face of a billion dollar Hillary
Clinton campaign here are examples of what the Mueller alleges the Russians
did:
a.
In or around June through July 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
purchased advertisements on Facebook to promote the "March for Trump"
and "Down with Hillary" rallies.
b. Defendants and their co-conspirators used false U.S.
personas to send individualized messages to real U.S. persons to request that
they participate in and help organize the rally. To assist their efforts,
Defendants and their co-conspirators, through false U.S> personas, offered
money to certain U.S. personas to cover rally expenses.
c. On or about June 5, 2016, Defendants and their
co-conspirators, while posing as a U.S. grassroots activist, used the account
@March_for_Trump to contact a volunteer for the Trump Campaign in New York. The
volunteer agreed to provide signs for the "March for Trump" rally.
There is no reference in the indictment to the
number of real Americans who participated or who attended. It’s doubtful that it persuaded anyone to
change their vote and there is no assertion that it affected the election.
What’s totally missing from the indictment is
the real reason that the 2016 election has divided the country more than any
time since the Civil War. The Russians
set off a few damp squibs. Meanwhile our
very own Liberal media, with the apparent support of a politicized FBI, CIA and
DOJ began lobbing nuclear bombs in the direction of Donald Trump, claiming that
his election was illegitimate. The
entire Liberal Establishment joined “The Resistance” as if they were French
freedom fighters opposing the Nazis. It wasn’t the Russians calling Trump Hitler,
Mussolini and worse. It wasn’t the
Russians who claimed that Trump conspired with Putin to steal the
election. It wasn’t the Russians who
called Trump insane. It wasn’t the
Russians who went on late night TV to tell dirty jokes about Trump fellating
Putin. And it wasn’t the Russians who
were demanding the end of the Trump administration via impeachment, a White
House coup or assassination. That was
the hysterics in the Liberal Establishment (along with the #NeverTrump Right).
There may be more indictments to come. The question needs to be asked: was there
another group of unidentified Russian operatives working behind the scenes to
influence American opinion makers? What
made the Democrat Party operatives, member of the media, and the entertainment
industry refuse to acknowledge that they lost an election? Posting on Facebook and Twitter, getting
someone to hold up a sign, paying someone to dress up as Hillary in prison is
all very well. But the biggest weapons
in a culture war are found in newsprint or over the airwaves.
“Regular” people, as Kurt Schlichter calls them
are really not the object of a sophisticated attack on a culture like
ours. If you want to really move the
needle you influence the influencers: the press, the talking heads, the comedians
… and the educators who will influence the young “skulls full of mush.” If we really want to dive down and see what’s
causing this country to rise up against itself, this is worth examining in
detail. And this is not what Robert
Mueller and his merry men are interested in doing.
1 comment:
So after all the disinformation about Donald Trump, what bothers Mueller is that the Russians were saying mean things about Hillary? Wonder if the Russians were to blame for her coughing fits and her inability to get into her SUV without help and her tripping up the jetway. Those rascally Russians, who even knows all they are responsible for to make sure the smartest woman in the world did not win the election. Oh wait, he says their efforts didn't affect the outcome. To quote a famous politician "What difference, at this point, does it make anyway?
Post a Comment