The New York Times Lies About Why It Pushed the Christine "Blowsey" Ford Story But Covered Up the Tara Reade AllegationQ: I've been looking at The Times’s coverage of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. I want to focus particularly on the Julie Swetnick allegations. She was the one who was represented by Michael Avenatti and who suggested that Kavanaugh had been involved in frat house rapes, and then appeared to walk back elements of her allegations. The Times wrote that story the same day she made the allegation, noting that "none of Ms. Swetnick's claims could be independently corroborated."Why was Kavanaugh treated differently?A: Kavanaugh was already in a public forum in a large way.Wait, I'm sorry-- Are you claiming that the presumptive challenger to be President of the United States is not "already in a public forum in a large way"?Are you fucking kidding me with this?!?!
Read the whole thing. The lying is now so blatant and in-your-face that they know that we know they're lying but now it's just instinct. They hate you and dare you to call them out.
No comments:
Post a Comment