The Truth Hurts, And It Will Hurt Leftists Most

 

So, the media is really mad that conservatives publicized how a hospital that admitted – hell, that proudly put on its website – how it mutilates kids to conform them to their (or their Munchausen mommies’) gender delusions actually mutilates kids to conform them to their (or their Munchausen mommies’) gender delusions. No, it didn’t, we were told. But it did. Moreover, telling the truth – again, a truth the hospital admitted and even kind of bragged about – was actual, literal violence. Yes, stating what the abattoir masquerading as a hospital said it did publicly was terrorism or something because normal people were naturally repelled at this hideous continuing atrocity.

The truth is problematic because it contradicts the narrative which, in this case, is “Of course we don’t chop up children to make them into bizarre simulacrums of the opposite gender.” But the narrative doesn’t stop there – no, the narrative is also “And it’s a good thing to chop up children to make them into bizarre simulacrums of the opposite gender. Shut up, transphobes.”

See, they deny doing it even though they also think it’s a groovy thing to do. Then they tell you that you are evil for speaking the truth. It’s like the whole CRT shell game. “CRT? Why, that’s a graduate school theory that is not taught in schools despite those documents we prepared stating that we are teaching CRT. Also, CRT cannot be removed from schools because it is a good thing that we must teach. Shut up racists.”

And let’s not forget the delightful euphemism of late-term abortion. “Why no, no one ever aborts a fetus at eight months, three weeks. Also, it’s vital to women’s health to kill babies at eight months, three weeks. Why do you hate women?”

The truth hurts, so the left just sort of hand waves the truth into oblivion and accuses you for bringing it up. Why allow bourgeois concepts like objective truth to get in the way of the Official Approved Narrative?

Well, because the truth matters.

Does the FBI and the DOJ need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission?

After the end of Apartheid, the South African government established a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, South Africa (TRC), a court-like body to help heal the country and bring about a reconciliation of its people by uncovering the truth about human rights violations that had occurred during the period of apartheid.   

Its emphasis was on gathering evidence and uncovering information—from both victims and perpetrators rather than prosecuting individuals for past crimes.

Perhaps we need a TRC to allow people in the Justice Department and the FBI to come forward and admit the abuse of civil rights that occurred during the Obama Administration as officials in the FBI and the Justice Department conspired to prevent the election of Donald Trump and, following the election, to engineer a slow-motion coup against a duly elected president. 

  

It appears that naming a new FBI director, Christopher Wray has done nothing to end the cover-up that continues unabated.   

The FBI just sent 29 armed and armored agents to arrest a 66-year-old man with no criminal record for the purpose of a televised “perp walk” designed to inflame the public.   

The DOJ refuses to reveal why, on the morning of November 19th, sixteen FBI agents raided the Maryland home of a DOJ whistleblower who was in possession of Clinton Foundation and Uranium One documents implicating Robert Mueller who now heads a group aimed at removing President Trump from office.

The DOJ has empowered a two-year investigation of any links between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin with the result of zero findings of collusion but the creation of process crimes created by the investigator.  

We are told that there are honest people in the FBI and DOJ who are angry about the cloud that now hovers over their departments.  If these people could come forward without fear of losing their jobs or going to prison, would that allow the truth to be revealed?  Would Truth and Reconciliation prevail, or are the battle lines now so sharply drawn between the sides that one side must destroy the other?

Did The Washington Post Lie About The Michelle Fields Incident?