Search This Blog

Showing posts with label New York Slimes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Slimes. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 04, 2020

Media Silent As Christopher Steele ‘Hero’ ‘Spymaster’ Narrative Crumbles

Mollie Heming way names names. 

 The media liars who peddled the Russia hoax. 

 Read the whole thing. 

 For years, the media assured Americans that the dossier alleging treasonous collusion between Donald Trump and Russia was based on the scrupulous work of a mastermind British ex-spy and his vast network of credible and well-connected sources spread throughout Europe. 

It wasn’t true. Steele did not personally collect any of the factual information in his reports. 

The “vast network” was instead a “social circle” of an American-based former Brookings Institute junior staffer, recently identified for the first time as Igor Danchenko. 

The friends didn’t have well-documented claims so much as rumors, drunken gossip, and outright brainstorming, conjecture, and speculation. 

Even that information was “multiple layers of hearsay upon hearsay” before it got to Steele, who then hyperbolically overstated it. 

And the damning claims of “collusion” appear to have been scandalously misattributed or invented out of whole cloth. 

With such shoddy information collection and analysis methods, there was never any reason to give credence to any of the salacious allegations in the dossier, whether it was claims of secret deals with Russian oil concerns, secret meetings in foreign capitals, prostitutes urinating on Moscow hotel room beds, files of compromising information, or the careful cultivation of Trump, yes Trump, into the most effective Russian agent in history. 
Here are the 21 primary liars that participated in a treasonous coup attempt to overthrow an elected American President.
  1.  Adam Goldman 
  2.  David Corn 
  3. Michael Horowitz 
  4.  Michael Isikoff 
  5.  Evan Perez 
  6. Jim Sciutto 
  7. Jake Tapper 
  8. Carl Bernstein 
  9. Michele Neubert 
  10. Ken Dilanian 
  11. Cassandra Vinograd 
  12. Tracy Connor 
  13. Bradley Hope 
  14. Michael Rothfeld
  15.  Alan Cullison 
  16. Scott Shane 
  17. Matthew Rosenberg 
  18. Luke Harding 
  19. Jane Mayer 
  20. Natasha Bertrand 
  21. Christian Caryl

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

“Black newspaper editor swivels from Trump-Russia Collusion narrative to “my people built the country while white people sat idly by drinking beer and burning crosses.”

Dean Baquet

Dean Baquet, the black editor of the failing NYTimes has made it his mission to tell the world that America was built by blacks while White Americans sat around drinking, raping and shooting innocent black babies when they were not lynching honor students on their way to grandma’s house.

Sunday, March 08, 2015

Political polarization


The Pew Center did a study asking people to define their political views and where they get their information.

Ideological Placement of Each Source’s Audience


When it comes to choosing a media source for political news, conservatives orient strongly around Fox News. Nearly half of consistent conservatives (47%) name it as their main source for government and political news, as do almost a third (31%) of those with mostly conservative views. No other sources come close.

Consistent liberals, on the other hand, volunteer a wider range of main sources for political news – no source is named by more than 15% of consistent liberals and 20% of those who are mostly liberal. Still, consistent liberals are more than twice as likely as web-using adults overall to name NPR (13% vs. 5%), MSNBC (12% vs. 4%) and the New York Times (10% vs. 3%) as their top source for political news.

If you go to the Pew survey you will note that the Left names more news sources (Slate, NY Times, CNN, NPR, etc) than the Right. That's proof, Leftists will say that we get our news from a variety of sources whereas the Right does not. 

But hold on young videogamer, do you get a diversity of opinion from NPR, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post or the alphabet networks? Actually you do not. You get the same slant on pretty much the same stories. The only difference in their coverage is the identity of the anchors or the names on the by-line. 

If you read the NY Times you can get the video version at ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, or CNN. Sometimes Slate will be more shrill and Politico will be more biased but it's all the same attitude. 

The reason that Conservatives congregate at Fox is because it occupies a space left totally unserved by the MSM which exists to massage the egos on the Left that they are good, smart and deserve to rule the knuckle dragging Neanderthals - the "low sloping foreheads" in the words of a recently deceased member of that tribe - who are not like them. Rush Limbaugh has a whole riff on them and it's hilarious.

Saturday, March 07, 2015

Is your newspaper poisoning you?


Everyone knows that the content of newspapers are filled with misinformation and outright lies.   But is your newspaper poisoning you simply by touching it?

Google "Toxicity of newsprint" brings up 3,320 results.

So if you pick up a newspaper, you may want to don protective gloves.

Better yet, stop your subscription.  Be safe and use the Internet.  It may have lots of incorrect information - like the newspaper - but it won't poison you.

Wednesday, January 07, 2015

NY Times "French massacred, Muslims worst hurt"



Here's How the NY Times views the murder of 12 Frenchmen by Islamic terrorists;

The sophisticated, military-style strike Wednesday on a French newspaper known for satirizing Islam is sure to accelerate the growth of anti-Islamic sentiment in Europe, feeding far-right nationalist parties like France’s National Front.

When French people get killed why do bad things always happen to Muslims?