Libarals Admit That Changing the Constitution Should Be Done By Amendment, Not By Judcial Whims!

By Jonah Goldberg:

On March 9, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an epochal ruling. The court found that the Second Amendment actually protects the right to bear arms for individuals.

Now, that in and of itself is huge. For decades, the courts, the legal and academic establishments, the press and all right-thinking people everywhere have been arguing that not only is the Second Amendment a chestnut from a bygone age, but that enlightened judges should just go ahead and void the darn thing like a bad parking ticket.
...
No, the real victory is that liberals are starting to accept the fact that the constitution has a meaning separate and distinct from what the most pliant liberal judge wants it to mean.
...
...as conservatives have argued for decades, [changing the Constitution] ...the ideal method is democratic debate and legislative deliberation, not judicial whim.

The Constitution is too important to be left to the tender mercies of the lawyers.
Amen