Search This Blog

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Racism at Obama "Department of Justice" (Payback Time of Angry Blacks?)




Here's the PJTV analysis


Several former DOJ employees have been in contact with Pajamas Media, interested in publicly supporting J. Christian Adams as he comes forward about the DOJ’s failure to enforce the country’s laws from a race-neutral perspective.

These former DOJ employees have expressed a willingness to go on record regarding Adams’ professionalism, excellent performance, and outstanding record of enforcing the law without racial bias.

Additionally, they would like to corroborate Adams’ statements about the DOJ.

And perhaps — pay attention, DOJ press liaisons — offer their own accounts regarding the DOJ’s hostility to race-neutral law enforcement.
From Glenn Reynolds (go there for links):
DON SURBER ON THE NEW BLACK PANTHER CASE: “This is a case of prosecutorial privilege and abuse. The Department of Justice reviewed it and decided it had no case, because it did not want to prosecute an ally of the president. That is the real reason this case was not pursued.”

UPDATE: DOJ Official: “We abetted wrongdoing and abandoned law-abiding citizens.”

Time for "honkies" to move to the back of the bus (or just not vote for fear of being beaten)?  Is this the (post racial) change we were hoping for?  With few exceptions, the MSM is averting its eyes.  This was, after all, their candidate.  As Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit would say: "They said if I voted for John McCain, we would see voting places blocked by angry club wielding bullies to keep people of a certain race from voting ... AND THEY WERE RIGHT!"

Somehow making NASA responsible for making Muslims feel good all seems part of an world view that not many people thought they were getting with the election of Barack Hussein Obama.  From Obama's NASA Administrator Charles Bolden:
...foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science
Let's see, what does NASA stand for?  Perhaps in line with the Obama administration penchant for re-naming things, we'll soon have a new name for NASA.  There's a good chance that Obama will be part of the name. Most of us didn't realize we were electing the blackface version of Grand Kleagle Robert W. Byrd.

Are these the people we were waiting for?  How's that HopeN'Change working for you?

UPDATE:  Here are one of the New Black Panthers (he's the one carrying the baton at the polling station)  in his own words ...  "I hate white people, all of them, every last iota of a "cracker" ... I hate him."  Then there's the part about killing white babies.



And that issue of re-directing NASA to make Muslims feel good?  From Byron York via Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit:
From a Nexis search a few moments ago:

Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program in the New York Times: 0.

Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program in the Washington Post: 0.

Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program on NBC Nightly News: 0.

Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program on ABC World News: 0.

Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program on CBS Evening News: 0.

If you were to receive your news from any one of these outlets, or even all of them together, and you heard about some sort of controversy involving the Obama administration redefining the space agency’s mission to feature outreach to Muslim countries, your response would be, “Huh?” Among all the news these distinguished outlets have seen fit to cover in recent days, the NASA story has not made the cut.

Doesn’t fit the narrative.
It explains why the MSM is the MFM and is dying.

No comments: