The question being asked "should Shirley Sherrod get her job back" now that it's established that her racism is being called into question; that the full tape makes clear that she's not so much into pitting blacks against whites are rich against poor.
It's all about "context" you see, and the MSM so anxious to heep the racist label attached to the Tea Party that they're willing to throw Shirley under the bus so that they can go on making the Tea Party the home of racism in America.
Not so long ago, Rush Limbaugh wanted to be part of a group buying the Rams. But some people used made-up quotes to smear him. After he was dropped from the buying group, the media dropped the issue. Objective accomplished.
Now that we have established that context matters in determining is someone is racis, can we go a step further and admit that lies are also off-limits when we call someone a racist?
Question #1: If Shirley gets her job back, should Rush get to own part of the Rams?
Question #2: Did the JournoList get involved in smearing Rush?
No comments:
Post a Comment