Courts Repeatedly Refused To Consider Trump’s Election Claims On The Merits

 

The Judiciary failed us in what was probably the most important election of the century.  This is important not just because of the result, but the procedure by which the result was obtained.  The Judiciary is revealed as corrupt and lacks the stature and esteem we give judges.  Note that 31 Missouri Judges Recuse Themselves from Lawsuit Alleging Family Court Guardians and Psychologists Orchestrated Money-Making Scheme

Courts Repeatedly Refused To Consider Trump’s Election Claims On The Merits...

In the end, should we be surprised that voters retain a strong sense of skepticism over the outcome of the presidential election? That a man who largely campaigned from his basement, who exhibited signs of age-related mental decline, could handily defeat a vigorous incumbent who drew immense crowds is naturally hard to believe.

The election of 2020, which included more than 155 million votes, was decided by approximately 300,000 votes in six states, or 0.2 percent of the electorate, all of which came by an unnatural flip of results late on election night. Despite judges’ repeated hand-wringing that any court action would disenfranchise millions of voters, the reality is that millions of others may have been disenfranchised, and they instinctively suspect so.

The one thing many voters seem to have learned through the legal chaos is that it’s easier to commit election violations than to stop them. So the electorate remains divided—even after “86 election cases.”

Read the whole thing and you'll have an answer when people tell you that 86 election cases decide that the election was fair.