How did global warming discussions end up hinging on what's happening with polar bears, unverifiable predictions of what will happen in a hundred years, and whether people are "climate deniers" or "global warming cultists?" If this is a scientific topic, why aren't we spending more time discussing the science involved? Why aren't we talking about the evidence and the actual data involved? Why aren't we looking at the predictions that were made and seeing if they match up to the results? If this is such an open and shut case, why are so many people who care about science skeptical? Many Americans have long since thought that the best scientific evidence available suggested that man wasn't causing any sort of global warming. However, now, we can go even further and suggest that the planet isn't warming at all.
Read the whole thing, but here are the five heads:
1) There hasn't been any global warming since 1997
2) There is no scientific consensus that global warming is occurring and caused by man
3) Arctic ice is up 50% since 2012
4) Climate models showing global warming have been wrong over and over
5) Predictions about the impact of global warming have already been proven wrong
No comments:
Post a Comment