This is becoming a pattern
A well-known female liberal blogger and radio host at the University of Wyoming (UW) is being accused by police of fabricating a rape threat against herself to appear as if it came from a conservative.
Comment by Mike Morris
This is not the first time she has done this. In fact during the Bill Ayres issue going on at UW, she made the same complaint but this time she claimed it against real students at UW. She accused these students of threatening to rape her over the Bill Ayres stuff. She has been known to bait people into checking out her facebook and then her blog, if you disagree with her she will accuse you of internet stalking. She has taken numerous students and residents of UW, and Cheyenne to court seeking protective orders, she does this to try and remove the gun rights of those she opposes. Do some research you will find that Meg herself has also been busted prior for gun crimes against a former employer then when caught tried to claim the whole rape story again.
What is the defense against this? The media and the academic community usually eat this stuff up. It's an opportunity for the administration to suspend classes and have a re-education camp on campus. There is very little the Right seems to be able to do against fabricated accusations. Are there legal remedies?
A comment by Phil Ridge
This is just like when a professor (there were two that I can think of in the past decade or so) is so wrapped up in their political activism that in order to prove to everyone how right they are in their case against perceived injustices, they create a situation and attack themselves just to be able to say "See? I TOLD YOU!" And then they go accuse some innocent gender, or race, or religion of people of being racist/anti-semitic/misogynist or what-have-you.A liberal black political activist professor hung a noose on her own classroom door and dumped urine all over the door and floor.A liberal jewish political activist professor spray painted nazi graffitti on her own car.What do they hope to prove? That their imagined world of injustice is so alive and real..... and then, since they can't find any real evidence to support their case that there are injustices everywhere they have to invent a case of their own to point to for validation? Is that what it's all about? Do they need to feel validated? I think the obvious truth in all of these people's lives could also be the one common factor in all of these cases... These people are mentally ill, and should not be allowed to purchase a weapon.
No comments:
Post a Comment