Did she do anything? Other than canceling her appearances — which she had to do to show decent sensitivity — she made a lot of ineffectual phone calls. For 5 hours, we're told, she "continued to call up and down the law enforcement food chain, from local to county to state to federal officials." She says, "I knew I was bugging a lot of these people."
Afterwards, she used the occasion to make a show of her emotions (or did you think she was cold and mechanical). She said:
"It affected me not only because they were my staff members and volunteers, but as a mother, it was just a horrible sense of bewilderment, confusion, outrage, frustration, anger, everything at the same time."
Is that what you want in a President? Someone who feels extra confusion because she's a mother?
But I don't believe that for one minute. I think that was just what was considered a good script. I don't happen to think it is a good script, because I don't want a President to roil into a mommyesque ball of emotion when a few people are in danger. Yet that's not Hillary. The only question is why she thought a statement like that was a good. She probably wanted to make sure not to confirm the widely held belief that she's unemotional, and, while she was at it, delight all the ladies out there who lap up emotional drivel.
"George" said:
Mmm..something very quintessentially female about her reactions...
"As a mother, it was just a horrible sense of bewilderment, confusion, outrage, frustration, anger, everything at the same time..."
What male presidential candidate would say anything remotely resembling that?
A guy would say something like, "Well, it was a pretty rough time. I thought the police handled it very well. It's a matter now for the courts, and that's all I can say. And, yeah, I'll be visiting those folks up there who had that experience. They held up well, and I'm proud of them."
Bewilderment? Confusion? I do not want a president who blobbers about being "bewildered."
No comments:
Post a Comment