Ace of Spades asks questions of the MSM, Democrat sexual practices and “trends.”
Two Democratic Senatorial Aides Nabbed for Child Porn; Media Predictably Uninterested in "Trend"But we really don’t have to ask the question, do we. The answer is that Democrats ARE more tolerant of sexual aberrations, they just pretend not to be. It’s the tribute vice pays to virtue.
...But I do happen to know for a fact that had these been Republicans, the media would be greatly interested in the "trend."
When the media bothers to explain such obvious bias at all, they always claim that there is an objective reason to publicize Republican sexual scandals and downplay Democratic ones -- "hypocrisy," of course. Those Puritanical scolds the Republicans are always nattering on about sexual morality, so of course the media gives such stories more play.
This "hypocrisy" excuse doesn't work in most cases, and it certainly doesn't work here. For these Democrats to be free of the taint of hypocrisy, it would have to be true that the Democratic Party's ideology was latitudinarian on child porn-- which, to my understanding, it is not.
Is the media claiming the Democratic Party isn't as opposed to child porn as Republicans? If so, let us have a report on that -- I'm sure the public would love to know that one party isn't quite on board with this whole anti-child-porn program.
Of course at some point in the not-too-distant-future the rights of child porn viewers and participants will be as great a cause as same-sex marriage is today. The old slogans are simply going to have to be updated from “get your prying eyes out of my bedroom” to “get your prying eyes out of the crib.”
Any social movement that can demonize people who own SUVs and riot for gay marriage is not about to stop at a little toddler sex.
No comments:
Post a Comment